Question 25: Some argue that the benefits of economic growth outweigh the environmental costs. What’s your view on this trade-off?

Model answer by Lifestyle Training Centre

There is a prevailing notion that economic growth should take precedence over environmental concerns. I strongly disagree, asserting that prosperity need not be achieved at the expense of environmental well-being.

History unequivocally demonstrates the dire consequences of unchecked exploitation of nature. Instances of disease outbreaks, floods, and droughts serve as stark reminders of the perils associated with indiscriminate industrialization and deforestation, both driven solely by economic motives. Such activities contribute to the degradation of the ozone layer, resulting in adverse living conditions. The sharp contrast between the tranquillity of villages and the environmental hostility of cities vividly underscores the toll of environmental neglect.

In opposition to the prevailing mindset favouring relentless resource extraction, I advocate for prioritizing the care of our planet. Investing in nature pays dividends in the form of clean air, favourable weather, and pure water. It is evident that economic progress can coexist with environmental preservation, as demonstrated by the successful transition to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and tidal power. These alternatives mitigate the need for environmentally harmful practices such as burning coal and fossil fuels.

In conclusion, the prevailing attitude of exploiting ecosystems for economic gain, without a shadow of doubt, is deplorable. Our focus should be on development that safeguards our environment. By embracing sustainable practices and eco-friendly technologies, we can achieve true economic prosperity without compromising the delicate balance of nature. It is imperative that we recognize the long-term benefits of environmental stewardship for the well-being of our planet and future generations.